Hematology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hematology 2006
© 2006 The American Society of Hematology

Making Therapeutic Decisions in Adults with Aplastic Anemia

Judith Marsh

Correspondence: Judith Marsh, MD, St. George’s Hospital, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK; Phone +44 (208) 7253545; Fax +44 (208) 7252859; Email jmarsh{at}sgul.ac.uk

Abstract

The management of adults presenting with aplastic anemia (AA) requires careful exclusion of other causes of bone marrow failure. Late-onset inherited forms of AA may present in adulthood with subclinical disease. Recent long-term studies of HLA identical sibling donor BMT show excellent survival for patients under the age of 40 years, but chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is still a major problem, impacting on quality of life. Recent improvements in outcome after matched unrelated donor BMT may reflect better donor matching and use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens. For patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IST), antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporin (CSA) remain the standard regimen with excellent overall survival but less impressive failure-free survival due to nonresponse, relapse and later clonal disorders. The benefit of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to ATG and CSA is unclear and being assessed in a further prospective European study. Patients who are refractory to conventional IST and currently ineligible for BMT represent difficult management problems. For these patients, new approaches to transplantation are being evaluated, such as fludarabine-based conditioning regimens and the potential use of double umbilical cord blood transplants, but there is a need for new immunosuppressive agents. Improved supportive care is likely to be a major factor in improved outcome of all AA patients whether treated with IST or BMT. Robust predictive factors for response to IST are needed to help in decision making at diagnosis and to help justify exploring novel approaches to therapy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Hematology.