Hematology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giralt, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giralt, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hematology 2005
© 2005 The American Society of Hematology

Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Hematologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned over the Last 10 Years?

Sergio Giralt

Correspondence: Sergio Giralt, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Box 423, Houston TX 77030-4009; Phone: (713) 794-5745, Fax: (713) 792-8314, sgiralt{at}mail.mdanderson.org

Abstract

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have been investigated for more than 10 years as an alternative to traditional myeloablative conditioning regimens. RIC regimens are being commonly used in older patients as well as in disorders in which traditional myeloablative conditioning regimens are associated with high rates of non-relapse mortality. Hodgkin disease, myeloma, and low-grade lymphoid malignancies have been the diseases most impacted by RIC regimens. RIC regimens have also been shown to be safe and effective in older patients as well as patients with co-morbidities, although patients with chemorefractory disease still have high relapse rates and poor outcomes. Patients with chemosensitive disease have outcomes similar to those obtained with conventional ablative therapies, and thus comparative trials are warranted. RIC regimens are associated with lower rates of severe toxicity and non-relapse mortality; however, infections, graft-versus-host disease, and relapse of primary disease remain the most common obstacles to a successful outcome. The impact on survival and the relative benefits of RIC allografting compared with traditional conditioning regimens or alternative therapy remain to be defined. Incorporating targeted therapies as part of the conditioning regimens or as maintenance therapies is currently being explored to reduce relapse rates without increasing toxicity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Hematology.